Legal Opinion
Stevens v. Federal Cartridge Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 23, 1948No. 34,617PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from an order overruling its demurrer to defendant’s answer insofar as it relates to the defense that plaintiff had not exhausted the administrative remedies provided by the Contract Settlement Act of 1944, 41 USCA, §§ 101 to 125, and by U. S. Public Law 657, c. 864 (approved August 7,1946), and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. The court below certified that the question raised by plaintiff’s demurrer is important and doubtful.
Defendant is a corporation which was engaged by the United States government during the period from 1941…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- MacAuley v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Rumsey Mfg. Corp. v. United States Hoffman MacHinery Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Jardine Mining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Rumsey Mfg. Corp. v. U. S. Hoffman Machinery Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1949
- Stevens v. Federal Cartridge Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949