Taecker v. Pickus
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurcpi, J.
Plaintiff brings this action tO' recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The cause was tried to a jury, and verdict returned in favor of plaintiff. Judgment was entered thereon, and defendant appeals from the judgment and an order denying a new trial.
Only one question is presented. Appellant claims there can be no recovery because respondent was guilty of contributory negligence. He admits that, where the evidence is such that different minds may reasonably draw different conclusions as to1 contributory negligence, the question is for the jury, but contends…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Lauson v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Roth v. BlomquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
- Ruth v. VroomMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Dehaan v. WolffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Flanagan v. SlatterySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Dwyer v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Ulrikson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Brown v. Raymond Bros. Motor Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Bock v. SellersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.