Legal Opinion

LeBlanc v. Sturgis

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 12, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

Common-law principles govern this personal injury case, the number of workmen regularly in the employ of the defendant at the time of the accident having been but five. R. S., Chap. 50, as amended by 1919 Laws, Chap. 238.

On December 1, 1928, defendant was in the steam sawmill busi*375ness at a place called Grindstone. He personally directed the work in his mill, and besides was sawyer. Plaintiff was marker. Another employee performed the duties both of fireman and engineer.

There is testimony that, before the mill had been started for the day on this December first, plaintiff, then standing near a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Illinois Steel Co. v. SchymanowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Meagher v. Crawford Laundry Machinery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Aho v. Adriatic Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Eaves v. Atlantic Novelty Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. Carroll v. Fore River Ship Building Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Savoy v. ButlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API