Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Martin v. Connor

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1984No. 82-1817PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented in this cause is whether a retroactive increase in DSS payments gives rise to a recoupable overpayment of DWRF benefits. This court has found that the recoupability of payments made under a mistake of fact depends on the circumstances.

In Indus. Comm. v. Dell (1922), 104 Ohio St. 389, this court did not require the refund of payments made under the good faith but mistaken belief that a woman was a deceased claimant’s widow. Upon discovery of the claimant’s lawful wife (from whom he had never been divorced) the payments were terminated, but the amounts already paid were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Weimer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State ex rel. Anderson v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Rouch v. Eagle Tool & Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State ex rel. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Russell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Russell v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API