Legal Opinion

Aloe v. Lowe

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1921No. 13919PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Denis E. Sullivan, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

The controversy on this appeal is whether the equitable interest of Frank M. Witbeck under the will of Henry Wit-beck in the one-half of the one-third interest in certain real estate devised to Henry J. Witbeck, after the latter’s death was a determinable fee or only a life estate. It was held to be a determinable fee in Lombard v. Witbeck, 173 Ill. 396, and on a former appeal in this cause. (Aloe v. Lowe, 278 Ill. 233.) It is now argued on behalf of the appellees that after the remandment of the cause in Lombard v. Wit-beck, with directions to enter a decree in conformity with the views…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mayor of Vicksburg v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Lombard v. WitbeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Clay v. Hildebrand Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  4. Aloe v. LoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Doscher v. BlackistonOregon Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. The People v. LamotheIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for the United States v. MilivojevichIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Queen City Coach Co. v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Yedor v. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1944
  5. Osina v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API