Legal Opinion

The Kroger Co. v. Keng

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)

Decided August 31, 1998No. 12-97-00267-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLCOMB, Justice.

Appellant, The Kroger Company (“Kroger”) appeals a judgment in favor of Appel-lee, Sonja Keng (“Keng”) for $30,000 in damages. This is a workers’ compensation nonsubscriber case in which the jury found that Kroger’s negligence caused Keng’s injury. Kroger raises two issues on appeal: 1) whether the trial court erred when it failed to submit a jury question on comparative responsibility; and 2) whether there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. We will affirm.

We will first address the factual sufficiency issue. Kroger alleges that the evidence is factually…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Walker v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kroger Co. v. KengTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Texas General Indemnity Co. v. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  3. Brookshire Bros., Inc. v. Lewis, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1999
  4. Jack in the Box, Inc. v. SkilesTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Skiles v. Jack in the Box, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API