Legal Opinion

Kroger Co. v. Keng

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 2000No. 98-1012PublishedCited by 266 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hankinson

The issue presented is whether a non-subscriber to workers’ compensation insurance is entitled to a jury question regarding its employee’s alleged comparative responsibility for his or her injuries. Sonja Keng sued Kroger Company, a workers’ compensation nonsubscriber, for work-related injuries. The trial court rendered judgment on the jury’s verdict for Keng, and Kroger appealed. Kroger complained that the trial court erred in refusing to submit a comparative-responsibility question to the jury. The court of appeals affirmed, holding that the comparative-responsibility statute does not apply…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Ltd. v. Williamson County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Little Rock Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Parker v. Highland Park, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by266 opinions

  1. In Re Poly-America, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Randy Austin v. Kroger Texas, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Texas West Oaks Hospital, LP v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Kroger Co. v. ElwoodTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. DownsTexas Supreme Court · 2002

261 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API