Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Baylor University v. Coley

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 2007No. 04-0916Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Johnson

I concur in the Court’s judgment.

By its first issue Baylor challenges the court of appeals’ determination that Coley, who had the burden to plead, prove, and obtain findings on her cause of action, properly preserved jury charge error when the proposed instruction she requested, which the trial court refused, was “wrong” as determined by this Court. Citing Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 278, Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Williams, 85 S.W.3d 162, 169-70 (Tex.2002) and Plainsman Trading Co. v. Crews, 898 S.W.2d 786, 791 (Tex.1995), Baylor questions whether Coley preserved error as to the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Plainsman Trading Co. v. CrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Placencio v. Allied Industrial International, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Coley v. Baylor University, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API