Legal Opinion

Hough v. Hunt

California Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1902No. Sac. No. 949PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. I. N. Thorne, James Farraher, James D. Fairchild, and Oliver P. Evans, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

This is a contest for a mining claim located upon the public land of the United States.

The plaintiffs had been in possession of a quartz-mining location for several years. The ground had been previously worked as a placer claim by one Borland, who, after having made a lode location, sold and conveyed it to plaintiffs. They proceeded to work upon it, spending, as the court found, about one thousand dollars in the development of the mine. They sunk a shaft upon the supposed lode some twenty-five feet, put up a winze, etc., and built a shed over their shaft. In 1898, however, according to the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kinsley v. New Vulture Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Golden Giant Mining Co. v. HillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Fredricks v. KlauserOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1924
  5. Gear v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API