Legal Opinion

Kinsley v. New Vulture Mining Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1907No. Civil No. 968PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District, in and for the County of Maricopa. Edward Kent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

— The New Vulture Mining Company, an Arizona corporation, brought suit against Charles L. Kinsley and George E. Sanders in the court below to quiet its title to a group of nineteen mining claims situate in Maricopa county, and known as the “Vulture Group.” The defendant Sanders filed an answer disclaiming any interest in and to the property. The defendant Kinsley answered the complaint in which he set up that by reason of relocations made by him about the 31st of May, 1904, he became the owner of the mining ground described in the complaint, and alleged that said relocations were valid at the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Altoona Quicksilver Mining Co. v. Integral Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Quimby v. BoydSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  3. Genella v. RelyeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Babbitt v. FieldArizona Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Justice Min. Co. v. BarclayU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Collins v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Roosevelt Irrigation DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Moulton v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Chiricahua Ranches Co. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. American Surety Co. of New York v. MosherArizona Supreme Court · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API