Ram Technical Services, Inc. v. Koresko
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Plaintiffs appeal, challenging the dismissal on summary judgment, ORCP 47 B, of their common-law fraud claim against defendants as being barred by claim preclusion arising from the determination of prior federal litigation between the parties or, alternatively, by the expiration of the statute of limitations. As amplified below, we conclude that, because plaintiffs could have raised their common-law claims in their federal litigation, they are precluded from litigating those claims in state court. Accordingly, we affirm.
The operative facts for purposes of our review are uncontroverted. On…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- George Acri v. Varian Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ram Technical Services, Inc. v. KoreskoOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Ram Technical Services, Inc. v. KoreskoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Lucas v. Lake CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- RAM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. v. KoreskoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008