Legal Opinion
RAM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. v. Koresko
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 23, 2008No. CV04100199; A130143PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Plaintiffs petition for reconsideration of our decision in Ram Technical Services, Inc. v. Koresko, 215 Or App 449, 171 P3d 374 (2007). There, we affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of plaintiffs’ common-law fraud claim, concluding that that claim was barred by claim preclusion arising from the disposition of prior federal litigation between the parties. Id. Plaintiffs contend, on reconsideration, that our determination as to claim preclusion was based on an erroneous premise, viz., that the federal district court had dismissed the prior litigation between the parties on the merits, rather…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Margaret Stewart Jamey L. Paulson William Keith Laura Spencer Lee Callison Stephanie Glowa Terri Gorecki Dan Berryman v. U.S. BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Cement Masons Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California v. Raymond StoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Ram Technical Services, Inc. v. KoreskoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ram Technical Services, Inc. v. KoreskoOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Ram Technical Services, Inc. v. KoreskoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Lucas v. Lake CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012