Legal Opinion
Creekmore v. Attorney General of Texas
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided March 30, 2001No. 2:00-cv-00264PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION REGARDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS CLAIMS
HINES, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the court are motions to dismiss by defendants Hon. John Cornyn, Attorney General of Texas, (Docket No. 10), Col. Thomas A. Davis, Director of Texas Department of Public Safety, (Docket No. 17), and Chief of Police, City of Beaumont, Texas, (Docket No. 20). By separate order entered this date, the court granted those motions and dismissed plaintiffs cause of action alleging deprivation of procedural due process of law. Plaintiffs remaining claims shall remain pending for decision.
This…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Creekmore v. Attorney General of TexasDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2004
- Alan Cross, individually on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Brendan Kelly, in his official Capacity as Director of the Illinois State PoliceDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2025