Legal Opinion

Creekmore v. Attorney General of Texas

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided September 30, 2004No. 4:00-cv-00264PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This action is before the undersigned for trial and entry of judgment by written consent of all parties.

This opinion states the court’s reasons underlying its disposition of competing motions for summary judgment. 1 It also constitutes findings of fact and conclusions of law for purposes of Rules 52 and 65, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

I. Nature Of Case

Meredith Trent Creekmore indulged “urges” through despicable sexual abuse of his daughter when she was two to four years of age. 2 With a level of gall that doesn’t compute, he objects to registering…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. LetalienSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  2. United States v. Anthony KebodeauxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  3. Meredith v. SteinDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2018
  4. Doe v. AbbottDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2018
  5. Steven McCraw v. C.I.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API