Legal Opinion

People v. Chung

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 2015No. B253580PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLLINS, J.—

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Helen Chung appeals from her conviction by jury on three counts of offering narcotics for sale, with special allegations regarding prior narcotics convictions. She was sentenced to a total term of 16 years four months and was ordered to pay various fines and fees. Chung raises a number of contentions on appeal: first, that the prosecutor improperly struck the only African-American prospective juror from the panel during voir dire; second, that evidence of her prior convictions was improperly admitted at trial; third, that one of the police officer…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. CorreaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. In re HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Melvin Martinez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Melvin Martinez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Murray v. LozanoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  4. United States v. Melvin Martinez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API