Legal Opinion

Murray v. Lozano

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 25, 2021No. 4:20-cv-00471Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RICKEY PAUL MURRAY, Case No. 20-cv-00471-HSG 8 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR 9 v. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; DENYING CERTIFICATE 10 J. LOZANO, OFAPPEALABILITY 11 Respondent. 12 13 Before the Court is the petition for a writ of habeas corpus of Petitioner Rickey Paul 14 Murray, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the validity of his state court 15 conviction. (Dkt. No. 1.) Respondent has filed an answer to the petition (Dkt. No. 16), and 16 Petitioner has filed a traverse (Dkt No.19). For the reasons…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API