United States v. Melvin Martinez-Lopez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
BERZON, Circuit Judge,
with whom Chief Judge THOMAS and Circuit Judge REINHARDT join, except as to Part IV, concurring in part, and dissenting in part:
I respectfully dissent as to the majority’s decision on the actus reus component of California Health and Safety Code § 11352(a). I concur with Respect to the statute’s controlled substance component, with a caveat.
I
As the Supreme Court has underscored repeatedly, the elements of the statute of conviction must be the sole focus in every application of the categorical or modified *1045categorical approach. See Mathis v. United States, — U.S. —, 136…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- People v. RussoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. TidemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.