Legal Opinion
Gennusa v. Shoar
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided July 17, 2012No. Case No. 3:09-cv-1208-J-32MCRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, District Judge.
Anne Marie Gennusa, a lawyer, and Joel Studivant, her client, allege that members of the St. Johns County Sheriffs Office *1342violated their Fourth Amendment rights and the Federal Wiretapping Act by recording their attorney-client conversations in an interview room at the Sheriffs Office and by forcefully seizing Studivant’s written statement. The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment (Docs. 27, 83), and the Court held hearings on these motions on April 1, 2011 and July 29, 2011, the transcripts of which are incorporated by reference (Docs. 35,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anne Marie Gennusa v. Brian CanovaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Aldrich v. RuanoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Hurdsman v. GleasonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2024
- United States v. LlufrioDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017