Legal Opinion
Anne Marie Gennusa v. Brian Canova
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 8, 2014No. 12-13871PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JORDAN, Circuit Judge:
While investigating an alleged misdemeanor violation of a domestic violence injunction, Detective Thomas Marmo and Sergeant Brian Canova monitored, intercepted, and listened to privileged conversations between their suspect, Joel Stu-divant, and his attorney, Anne Marie Gennusa, who were in an interview room at the St. Johns County Sheriffs Office. They did so without any notice to Mr. Studivant and Ms. Gennusa, and without a warrant. Det. Marmo also seized from Ms. Gennusa, on Sgt. Canova’s order, a statement written by Mr. Studivant. This too was done without a warrant.
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- United States v. Angel PuentesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Jennifer Dupree v. Mrs. Pamela OwensCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- Rene Alvarez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Robert Earl Butts v. GDCP WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- D.H., Ex Rel. Dawson v. Clayton County School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.