Legal Opinion

Hirano v. Davidson

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided December 23, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01352Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO SH 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Douglas A. Hirano, No. CV 21-01352-PHX-MTL (DMF) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 Unknown Davidson, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Douglas A. Hirano, who was previously confined at the Federal 16 Correctional Institution (FCI)-Phoenix, brought this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 17 the Federal Tort Claims Acts (FTCA) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal 18 Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971). Defendants have filed Motions to Dismiss for 19 failure to state a claim pursuant to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API