Falasco v. Hulen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiffs, Dominic Falasco and Mrs. Dominic Falasco, had judgment against the defendant for and on account of injuries alleged to have been suffered at the hands of the defendant by reason of his negligent management of an automobile on the thirteenth day of March, 1932. No judgment was entered in favor of the other plaintiffs named in the action. From the judgment in favor of Dominic Falasco and Mrs. Dominic Falasco, the defendant appeals.
The defendant, Hulen, filed a cross-complaint against Dominic Falasco and Frank Dambrosio et al. Judgment went against defendant Hulen, upon his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Balthasar v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Florio v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
- Manwaring v. GeislerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rocha v. HulenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Rubinow v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Roselle v. BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- West v. CruzArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Galeppi Bros. Inc. v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.