Legal Opinion
William F. Leonick v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 2, 1958No. 237, Docket 24800PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge.
The sole issue raised by this appeal is-whether a suit brought under Section 8'-(The Reemployment Provision) 1 of the: Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C.App. § 308, as amended, now 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 459, is time-barred by the failure of the plaintiff to commence the suit until at least ten years had elapsed from the date that his cause of action accrued.
Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint and plaintiff’s affidavit filed in opposition thereto contains the following facts.
The plaintiff William F. Leonick was employed by the defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Harrisons & Crosfield, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Redman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- John F. Le Gate, Libelant-Appellant v. The Panamolga, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and Compania Naviera Dalmatica, S.A., and Dalmore Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Shell v. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
3Cited by27 opinions
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Conopco, Inc., D/B/A Van Den Bergh Foods Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Campbell Soup Company, Defendants-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Goodman v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Carell v. Shubert Organization, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- George W. Bell, Jr., James E. Brewton, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Aerodex, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.