Lee v. Scottsdale Insurance Co., No. Cv980350438 (Feb. 8, 1999)
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
ARTICULATION OF NOVEMBER 9, 1999 RULINGS STRIKING A CUIPA CLAIM AND DECLINING TO STRIKE A CUTPA CLAIM
Plaintiff Claude Lee and defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company have each filed motions for articulation as to this court's ruling on defendant's motion to strike counts two and three of plaintiff's amended complaint sounding in CUIPA and CUTPA, respectively. This court ruled on November 9, 1998 that with respect to motion to strike # 105, the motion to strike the CUIPA claim was granted and the motion to strike the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mead v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Westport Bank & Trust Co. v. CorcoranSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Lees v. Middlesex InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Griswold v. Union Labor Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.