Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Coe

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 17, 1940No. Nos. 66339, 66340PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUHRING, Justice.

This is a proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 63, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to obtain a patent. The cases were consolidated for trial.

In Equity No. 66,339, the patent sought is for an “Apparatus and Process for the Production of Carbon Black and Acetylene by the Pyrolysis of Hydrocarbon Gases and Vapors.”

The application was filed with the Patent Office on July 16, 1934 and was given serial number 735,442. There were twenty-four claims, all of which were rejected by the Examiner on the prior art. On appeal the Board of Appeals affirmed the decision of the Examiner July 31, 1937. The bill of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Globe-Union, Inc. v. Chicago Telephone Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  2. R. J. Moran Co. v. Seeck & Kabe, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  3. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co. v. CoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1942
  4. Hooker Electrochemical Co. v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1954
  5. Levy v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API