Legal Opinion
Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co. v. Coe
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 7, 1942No. Nos. 6339, 13055PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LETTS, Justice.
Findings of Fact.
1. These suits were each brought under the provisions of Section 4915, R.S., 35 U. S.C.A. § 63, by Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, plaintiff, as assignee of the patent application of John A. Brown and John Edmund Clarke, Ser. No. 171,990, filed in the United States Patent Office on October 30, 1937, and also as assignee of the patent application of the same John A. Brown and John Edmund Clarke, Ser. No. 345,538, filed July 13, 1940 (the latter application being based upon the disclosure of the earlier filed application of said John A. Brown and John…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Gandy v. MarbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corporation v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Lucke v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Canadian-American Pharmaceutical Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- R. J. Moran Co. v. Seeck & Kabe, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Bowser, Inc. v. Richmond Engineering Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1958
- Hooker Electrochemical Co. v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1954
- Worel v. OomsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1947