Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Joseph v. Redwing

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1988No. 15879PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a contempt order in a child support action claiming that the circuit court lacked subject matter jurisdiction by virtue of a prior tribal court divorce. We affirm.

Both parties to this appeal are Indian. Appellant Norman Redwing (Norman) is a member of the Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe and currently resides on Indian land. According to the stipulation of facts, appel-lee Karen A. Joseph, formerly Karen A. Redwing (Karen), is a member of the Ft. Yates Sioux Tribe of North Dakota but resides in Aberdeen, South Dakota (not Indian country), with the couple’s…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. State v. ZobelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Mexican v. Circle BearSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Matthews v. MatthewsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  5. State Ex Rel. Wieber v. HenningsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Sac & Fox Tribe of Oklahoma Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Wells v. WellsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Sazama v. State Ex Rel. MuilenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Red Fox v. HettichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Application of DefenderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API