Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 7, 1996No. 950035-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

Defendant Louis M. Clark appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to correct his sentence. We conclude defendant’s appeal is barred under the doctrine of res judicata and therefore dismiss defendant’s appeal.

FACTS

On November 18,1992, defendant was convicted by jury trial of two counts of falsely signing a financial card sales slip. At the close of trial, the court indicated it would review the presentence report prepared by Adult Probation and Parole (AP & P) for Judge Hanson in a separate, but related case, and directed defendant to give AP & P any additional…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Boggess v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. TelfordUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. SommervilleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  3. Acosta v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  4. State v. LaraCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  5. State v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API