Legal Opinion

Walters v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1905No. 13,922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the district court for Red Willow county: Robert C. Orr, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Ames, C.

There is no dispute of fact and but a single question of law involved in this case, which is a proceeding in error for the reversal of a judgment for the defendant in the district court. The action is against the relief or insurance department of the defendant company for a recovery by a beneficiary named in a certificate of membership on account of the accidental death of a member, and Avas submitted at the trial upon a stipulation of facts of which the following is a copy:

“It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the plaintiff and the defendant in the above entitled action:…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. OlsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HealyNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Hartman v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Koeller v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Roberson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API