Walters v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Red Willow county: Robert C. Orr, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Ames, C.
There is no dispute of fact and but a single question of law involved in this case, which is a proceeding in error for the reversal of a judgment for the defendant in the district court. The action is against the relief or insurance department of the defendant company for a recovery by a beneficiary named in a certificate of membership on account of the accidental death of a member, and Avas submitted at the trial upon a stipulation of facts of which the following is a copy:
“It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the plaintiff and the defendant in the above entitled action:…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. OlsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HealyNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Hartman v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Koeller v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Roberson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1922