Legal Opinion
Jones v. Quintana
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 1, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2008-0620PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge.
Plaintiff Alexandria Jones, a former employee of the District of Columbia Office of Unified Communications (“OUC”), filed suit against the District of Columbia and Janice Quintana, the Director of the OUC, alleging that (1) the Defendants retaliated against the Plaintiff in violation of the District of Columbia Whistleblower Protection Act, D.C.Code §§ 1-615.51 et seq.; (2) Defendant Quintana retaliated against the Plaintiff for exercising her First Amendment rights in violation of the 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and (3) the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Hopkins v. Women's Division, General Board of Global MinistriesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Salar v. PruittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Jones v. QuintanaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Dehaarte v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Dunn v. McDonoughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Salak v. McCarthyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017