Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Fostoria Daily Review Co. v. Fostoria Hospital Ass'n

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1987No. 87-102PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The determinative issue posed in this appeal is whether R.C. 149.99 provides the exclusive remedy to compel compliance with the public records statute, R.C. 149.43.1

*329R.C. 149.99, as amended effective July 1, 1985, provides:

“Any person aggrieved by a violation of section 149.351 or 149.43 of the Revised Code, or both of these sections, may bring a civil action to compel compliance, and may recover a forfeiture of gne thousand dollars and reasonable attorneys fees for each violation.”

The cause sub judice originated in the court of appeals where appellant requested a writ of mandamus seeking…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Stanley v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  4. State ex rel. Cody v. TonerOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State ex rel. Harmon v. BenderOhio Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fox v. Cuyahoga County Hospital SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Scanlon v. DetersOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State ex rel. Fostoria Daily Review Co. v. Fostoria Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. The Warren Newspapers, Inc. v. HutsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Multimedia, Inc. v. SnowdenOhio Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API