Legal Opinion

Ordmandy v. Lynn

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1984PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stephen Smyk, J.

This is a motion by defendant, Toyota Motor Corporation, a Japanese corporation, for an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 8) dismissing this action as against Toyota Motor Corporation on the ground that the service of process upon defendant by registered mail in Japan was insufficient under New York law (Business Corporation Law, § 307) and under the international Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters (Hague Convention, 20 US Treaties 361). Plaintiffs contend that service of process…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maximov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Day v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  3. Low v. WerkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Orzechowski v. Warner-Lambert Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. Smith v. Dainichi Kinzoku Kogyo Co., Ltd.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1988
  3. Mommsen v. Toro Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1985
  4. Suzuki Motor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. McClenon v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API