Legal Opinion · Dissent

Van Horn v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 12, 1994No. 20, September Term, 1990Published

1DissentMcAULIFFE, Judge

I do not agree that the legislature abrogated the common law right to rescind an insurance policy procured by fraud when it enacted compulsory insurance provisions.

I

Van Horn applied for automobile liability insurance with Atlantic in October, 1984. The written application he signed was marked “No” in response to the question “Has any driver above ... a physical impairment?” At the time, Van Horn was under the active care of a physician for epilepsy that had begun in 1982. The evidence demonstrated that in April and June of 1988, and in February of 1984, he had suffered grand mal seizures,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GartelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Campbell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Teeter v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  5. American Underwriters Group, Inc. v. WilliamsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API