In the Matter of Roseann Kilduff v. Rochester City School District
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Lippman.
By letter dated September 23, 2011, respondent School District notified petitioner, a tenured school social worker, that she was to be suspended for 30 days without pay for specified misconduct. Petitioner made a written request for a hearing on the specifications pursuant to Education Law § 3020-a, but was advised by respondent that she was not entitled to the process prescribed in that statute, and could challenge the disciplinary determination against her only by means of the procedures set forth in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Riley v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Holt v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of Soriano v. EliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- The Matter of City of New York v. New York State Nurses AssociationNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
- The Matter of City of New York v. New York State Nurses AssociationNew York Court of Appeals · 2017