Legal Opinion

Smith v. American Economy Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 1, 1990No. 2-89-166-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FARRIS, Justice.

The Smiths appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the appellees in a workers compensation case. In four points of error, they assert that the trial court erred in granting a Motion for Summary Judgment because: (1) their causes of action are not preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (hereinafter referred to as “ERISA”); (2) they are not judicially estopped to assert their causes of action; (3) the summary judgment motion was not supported by evidence sufficient to support such a judgment; and (4) the defenses urged by the Motion for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Long v. KnoxTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Brannon v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Brannon v. Pacific Employers InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Izaguirre v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  5. Rodriguez v. American Home Assurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Benson v. Wyatt Cafeterias, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1991
  2. Aranda v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API