Legal Opinion

State ex rel. District 1199, Health Care & Social Service Union v. Lawrence County General Hospital

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1998No. 98-837PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5), we must now determine whether dismissal, an alternative writ, or a peremptory writ is appropriate. In making this determination, we apply the following standards:

“Under S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5), dismissal is appropriate if it appears beyond doubt, after presuming the truth of all material factual allegations and making all reasonable inferences in favor of relator, that relator is not entitled to the requested extraordinary relief. State ex rel. Edwards v. Toledo City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 106, 108, 647 N.E.2d 799, 801-802. If, on the other…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. SchroederOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Edwards v. Toledo City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Fox v. Cuyahoga County Hospital SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. University of Toledo FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Morgan v. City of New LexingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Weiss v. HooverOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. DeBrosse v. CoolOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Gaydosh v. City of TwinsburgOhio Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API