State v. Sandquist
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Blue Earth county charged with the crime of carnal knowledge of a female child under 18 years of age, tried in the district court for that county before Comstock, J., and a jury which returned a verdict of guilty as charged in the indictment. From the judgment entered pursuant to the .verdict, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the conviction of the defendant of the crime of camal knowledge of a female under the age of 18 years.
Defendant asks for a reversal on several grounds. Only three need be considered: The first, that he was unduly restricted in his cross-examination of the girl; the second, that the court’s examination of defendant’s witness Lillygren was prejudicial to him; the third, that by calling the clerk of court as a witness and examining him and then leaving the bench and taking the witness stand and testifying as a witness himself, the trial…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People of the State of N.Y. v. . DohringNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Wheeler v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Dunn v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Gray v. CrockettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. CianfloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- State v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Olson v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State v. ZimmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.