Legal Opinion
David J. BECHTOLD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 15, 1997No. 96-1597PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Circuit Judge.
David Bechtold, former Parks and Recreation Director for the City of Rosemount, Minnesota (“the City”), filed suit against the City for unlawful termination in violation of his due process rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (ADEA), and the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn.Stat § 363 et seq. (MHRA). The district court 1 granted the City’s motion for summary judgment, and Bechtold appeals.
FACTS
Bechtold began his tenure as the Parks and Recreation Director for the City in 1983. Ten years later, in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- John Stanton v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Kougasian v. TMSL, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Vern T. Jordahl v. Democratic Party Of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Kougasian v. Tmsl, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Davidson & Associates v. JungCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.