Legal Opinion

Great Lakes Gas Transmission Ltd. Partnership v. Essar Steel Minnesota LLC

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 5, 2016No. 16-1101PublishedCited by 150 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership (“Great Lakes”) brought suit against Essar Steel Minnesota, LLC and related entities (“ESML”) for breach of contract in federal court, asserting diversity jurisdiction. The parties later discovered that diversity jurisdiction did not exist, and ESML filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court held that it had federal question jurisdiction and denied the motion. The case proceeded to trial, and judgment was entered for Great Lakes. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by150 opinions

  1. Allco Renewable Energy Ltd. v. Massachusetts Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. Martinson v. Mahube-Otwa Cmty. Action P'ship, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
  3. Pathfinder Transport, LLC v. Pinnacle Propane, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2017
  4. South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2017
  5. Alencia Jackson v. Steris CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2026

145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API