Legal Opinion

PERSONNEL DIV. OF EXECUTIVE DEP'T v. St. Clair

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 23, 1972PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This is an administrative review proceeding au thorized by ORS 183.480 (2). Petitioner, tbe State Personnel Division, seeks judicial review of the administrative findings and order of the respondent Public Employe Relations Board (PERB) which were in favor of four classified state employes. The challenged order held that petitioner in amending its Rule 32-320 ① and replacing it with Rule 32-325 and Rule 32-330, ② effective September 9, 1971, wrongfully deprived respondent employes and others of being considered for salary increases “on the first of the month following six full months of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Naef v. AllentownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Raymond v. ChristianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Risley v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wright v. Kansas Water OfficeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  2. Abbott v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  3. Baker v. Civil Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Dudkin v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Grant v. NelliusSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API