Legal Opinion

Naef v. Allentown

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1967No. Appeals, 139 and 140PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Eagen,

The question posed by these appeals is, whether or not the city solicitor and assistant city solicitors of a third class city in Pennsylvania may be removed from office and deprived of the emoluments thereof at the pleasure of the city council, and, without cause shown, at any time prior to the expiration of the four-year terms for which the appointments were made.1 The lower court answered the question in the affirmative. We agree and affirm.

Article VI, §4 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania provides in part: “Appointed officers, other than judges of the courts of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Chester Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Watson v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Bowers v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Vega v. BURGETTSTOWN BOROUGH.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Foreman v. HampsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ness v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. Ballou v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Bradley v. West Chester University of the Pennsylvania State System of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Specter v. VignolaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Patterson v. City of ChesterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API