Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 2, 1960No. 3-59 Civ. 56PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

In this diversity action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff prevailed by return of a verdict on April 8, 1960 in the sum of $5,537.50.

Defendant at a special term of this Court in St. Paul, Minnesota, moved in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial on the following grounds:

1. The verdict is against the weight of the evidence;

2. The verdict is contrary to law; and

8. Errors assigned.

The facts are relatively simple. Plaintiff, 74 years of age, was on the premises of defendant, as a customer and invitee, on September 22,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company, a Corporation v. Marvin D. ZahnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  2. Frank Altrichter v. Shell Oil Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  3. Alma Stofer v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  4. Hubbard v. Montgomery Ward Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Lyon v. Dr. Scholl's Foot Comfort Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co., a Corporation v. Norma BarkdollCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  2. Barkdoll v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API