Barkdoll v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff had a verdict for $4,000.00 in this diversity action commenced and tried to the Court and jury to recover damages attributed to defendant’s negligence.
Plaintiff’s evidence was directed at plaintiff’s falling on steps upon defendant’s premises.
Defendant has moved in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. The grounds relied on by movant are these:
1. The verdict is contrary to the evidence.
2. The verdict is contrary to law.
3. Errors assigned.
1. Is the verdict contrary to the evidence ?
The facts in evidence disclose that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mounds Park Hospital, A/K/A N. W. Baptist Hospital Association v. Evelyn Von Eye and Dr. E. M. Hammes, Sr., Dr. E. M. Hammes Jr., and Dr. D. D. NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. MacKayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Hubbard v. Montgomery Ward Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Messner v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Lyon v. Dr. Scholl's Foot Comfort Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.