Christie v. Hartley Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
Where the six-year statute of repose barred plaintiffs’ action despite a twenty year express warranty, we affirm the order of the trial court.
*285 Facts and Procedural History
Plaintiffs George and Deborah Christie filed a complaint against defendants Hartley Construction, Inc., (Hartley), GrailCoat Worldwide, LLC, (GrailCoat), and GrailCo, Inc. (GrailCo) (GrailCoat & GrailCo, collectively referred to as “GrailCoat”) on 31 October 2011. The complaint alleged that in 2004, plaintiffs entered into an agreement for Hartley to construct a custom home (“Residence”) for plaintiffs in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Black v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Fatta v. M & M Properties Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Manecke v. KurtzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Roemer v. Preferred Roofing, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Glens of Ironduff Property Owners Ass'n v. DalyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Christie v. Hartley Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2014