Legal Opinion

Christie v. Hartley Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 16, 2013No. COA12-1385PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

Where the six-year statute of repose barred plaintiffs’ action despite a twenty year express warranty, we affirm the order of the trial court.

*285 Facts and Procedural History

Plaintiffs George and Deborah Christie filed a complaint against defendants Hartley Construction, Inc., (Hartley), GrailCoat Worldwide, LLC, (GrailCoat), and GrailCo, Inc. (GrailCo) (GrailCoat & GrailCo, collectively referred to as “GrailCoat”) on 31 October 2011. The complaint alleged that in 2004, plaintiffs entered into an agreement for Hartley to construct a custom home (“Residence”) for plaintiffs in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Black v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Fatta v. M & M Properties Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Manecke v. KurtzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Roemer v. Preferred Roofing, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Glens of Ironduff Property Owners Ass'n v. DalyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Christie v. Hartley Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API