Legal Opinion

Rigsby v. Pitner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1960No. 13260PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WERLEIN, Justice.

This suit was brought by Katie Rigsby and husband, W. H. Rigsby, and Daisy Burks and husband, James A. Burks, against Roy M. Pitner, Jr. and Ernest R. Causey, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by Mrs. Rigsby and Mrs. Burks in a collision between an automobile operated by Mrs. Burks and a GMC carryall owned by defendant, Roy M. Pitner, Jr., and at the time driven by his employee, Ernest R. Causey. Prior to the trial, Causey died, and by order of the trial court the cause against Roy M. Pitner, Jr., ap-pellee herein, was severed from the cause of action…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Biggers v. Continental Bus System, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Lynch v. RickettsTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. MueggeTexas Supreme Court · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. E. L. Cheeney Company and Edmon Lewis Fregia v. Walter L. Gates, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. Douglass v. Panama, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Urban Renewal Agency of San Antonio v. Bridges Signs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Sweeney v. United Core, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API