Legal Opinion
Rubenstein v. Ball Bros.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 19, 1984No. 83-4294PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge.
Rubenstein, bankruptcy trustee for the New England Fish Co., appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing his negligence, third party beneficiary contract, equitable subrogation, and equitable indemnity claims against appel-lees. Rubenstein’s claims arose from the appellees’ alleged negligent processing of fish sold by the New England Fish Co. to a Japanese corporation.
We affirm the district court’s summary judgment dismissing the negligence, third party beneficiary contract, equitable subro-gation, and equitable indemnity claims.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Cochise College Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Heiniger v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Berg v. General Motors Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
- Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re New England Fish CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Clerk, U.S. Bankruptcy Court (In re Chateaugay Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. ClerkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996