Borden Co. v. Sylk
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SUR MOTION TO DISMISS CROSS-CLAIMS (Document 30)
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
The Borden Company (hereinafter called Borden or plaintiff) sues William Sylk and Harry S. Sylk (hereinafter called the Sylks or defendants) as the endorsers of five promissory notes which, plaintiff alleges, remain partially unpaid by the maker.1 The defendants have joined Penrose Industries Corporation (hereinafter called Penrose or third-party defendant), which is the maker of the fifth note and the successor corporation to the makers of the other four notes, as a third-party defendant (Document…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Great Lakes Rubber Corporation v. Herbert Cooper Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Mary Taylor, Administratrix of the Estate of John H. Taylor, Deceased v. Rederi A/s Volo v. Lavino Shipping Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- E. J. Korvette Co. v. Parker Pen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- G & M Tire Co. v. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Critical-Vac Filtration Corporation v. Minuteman International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- USM Corp. v. SPS Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Pitcavage v. Mastercraft Boat Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Insultherm, Inc. v. Tank Insulation International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
- Old Homestead Bread Co. v. Continental Baking Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1969