Legal Opinion
G & M Tire Co. v. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp.
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided October 30, 1964No. DC6425PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAYTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff sued Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corporation and three other defendants for damages alleging in essence that while it was a distributor for Dunlop products, Dunlop conspired with the other defendants to market through them, products identical to the Dunlop products being distributed by plaintiff but under another brand name, that Dun-lop sold such products to the other defendants at much lower, discriminatory prices, thus ruining plaintiff’s business and causing it to become insolvent. These acts, plaintiff alleges, were in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- E. J. Korvette Co. v. Parker Pen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mayer Paving & Asphalt Co. v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Chase Manhattan BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Hansbarger v. CookWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- Wearly v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.