Legal Opinion
United National Insurance v. R&D Latex Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 15, 2001No. Nos. 99-55259, 99-55966, 99-56078PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
These three appeals are the latest round in a seemingly never-ending bout of litigation between Mydrin, Inc., and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company (formerly, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company), one of Mydrin’s insurers. All three appeals stem from a dispute over Travelers’ coverage of Mydrin for losses resulting from state-court lawsuits filed against Mydrin by two of its customers.
*1106Travelers brings two appeals. The first is from an order of the district court declining to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bly-Magee v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United National Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Formerly Known as Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. R&d Latex Corporation, a Georgia Corporation Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc., a California Corporation, and Mydrin, Inc., for Itself and as Successor in Interest to R&d Latex Corp., Mydrin, Inc., for Itself and as Successor in Interest to R&d Latex Corp., Plaintiff-Counter v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Formerly Known as Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, and William C. Morison-Knox and Michael D. ProughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Adams v. KijakaziDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023