Legal Opinion

City of Topeka v. Zufall

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from, Shawnee District Court. PkosecutioN for the violation of ordinances Nos. 459 and 494 of the city of Topeka, prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors within said city. The defendant Zufall was tried and convicted in the police court. He appealed to the district court, and was there tried and found guilty, and on January 5, 1888, was sentenced to pay a fine of $100, and the costs. He appeals. The material facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SimpsoN, C.:

On the 28th day of September, 1887, J. E. Stone made complaint in writing before the police judge of the city of Topeka, charging the defendant, Fred Zufall, with the sale of intoxicating liquors within said city. On the 30th day of September, 1887, the case was tried in the police court and the defendant convicted. The defendant appealed to the district court, and was there tried and convicted, and has now appealed to this court.

The defendant was tried and convicted under ordinances numbered 459 and 494, of the city of Topeka. These ordinances are claimed to be illegal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Intoxicating-Liquor CasesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Luke v. Calhoun CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  3. Adler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  4. Jones v. InnessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  5. Schlicht v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kaull v. BlackerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Chapman v. BoyntonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1933
  3. State ex rel. Wyman v. OwstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. State v. CorbinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. State v. Parker.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API