Legal Opinion

Mintzer v. Carl M. Loeb, Rhoades & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 23, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

In this action for breach of contract for failure to pay an alleged finder’s fee, plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered July 14, 1959, in favor of defendant Carl M. Loeb, Rhoades & Co., and from an order of July 3, 1959, granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as to it and dismissing the same with prejudice.

On or about January 10, 1956, plaintiff commenced an action by the service of an unverified complaint. April 1,1957, plaintiff filed an amended and still unverified complaint adding a third defendant.

On January 3, 1958, the complaint was dismissed pursuant to rule 302…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Stokes v. . StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Matter of Franklin v. FranklinNew York Court of Appeals · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Armende Lesser, Appellant-Appellee v. Morris Migden, Trustee, Appellee-Appellant. In the Matter of Mike Misuirello, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  2. Behar v. OrdoverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Aguilar v. JacobyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Marshall-Schule Associates, Inc. v. GoldmanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987
  5. Persaud v. GoriahNew York Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API